Fulton County

Fulton County Sheriff’s Office

Building Compliance That Outlasts the Decree

Our diverse partner base and deep expertise in personnel management have made Benchmark the de facto platform for consent decree compliance, ensuring transparency, accountability, and evidence-based early intervention. Trusted by more than 2,200 agencies nationwide and anchored by a research partnership with the University of Chicago.

Fulton County Sheriff's Office

A Message From Our Partner

Having had the privilege of leading both the Baltimore and New Orleans Police Departments, I understand the pivotal role Early Intervention Systems (EIS) play in reform, especially for agencies under Consent Decree.

In 2023, Benchmark won Baltimore’s competitively bid RFP for a predictive, research-based EIS that met our compliance needs. After consulting with the Department of Justice and the monitoring team, it was clear Benchmark was the right choice.

Their proven track record and deep research base make them the most cost-effective and time-efficient option. Benchmark’s system is pre-built and configurable, offering FCSO a faster path to compliance. Their expertise will ensure a successful, timely implementation.

Commissioner Michael Harrison
Commissioner (Ret.) Michael Harrison
Former Superintendent, New Orleans PD  |  Former Commissioner, Baltimore PD
The Compliance Crosswalk

Where the 34 provisions meet the Benchmark Blueprint

This is the summary view of the detailed mapping built into the proposal. Each area of the decree lines up against a specific Benchmark module, with current compliance status reflecting the Monitor’s Second Report.

34 Provisions We Support
2 Substantial Compliance
19 Partial Compliance
13 Non-Compliant
Compliance Area Provisions Current Status Benchmark Module
Early Warning System
Behavioral pattern detection, grievance and complaint integration
¶151 Partial First Sign®
Training
Policy, procedure, and in-service training documentation and delivery
¶¶31 to 40 Partial BMS Training Module
Officer Wellness
Proactive wellness monitoring, exposure tracking
¶¶62, 133 Non-Compliant First Sign® Precision Wellness
Quality Assurance
Corrective action planning, pattern analysis, documentation
¶¶293 to 305 Partial / Non BMS + C.A.R.E.®
On ¶151 specifically: the Monitor’s finding is that the current Early Warning System does not ingest grievance allegations or external complaints. That is the exact gap First Sign® was built to close, with behavioral indicators validated through research with the University of Chicago rather than static thresholds that drown supervisors in false positives.

What we’ve put together for your team

Meeting Deck

FCSO Executive Briefing, March 12, 2026

The slides from the executive session. Covers the platform overview, the consent decree mapping, and the roadmap for the two deep dives.

Open the deck →
Provision Mapping

Consent Decree Compliance Mapping

Full crosswalk of all 34 Benchmark-relevant provisions against the Monitor’s Second Report findings and the specific Benchmark module that addresses each one.

Open the mapping →
Monitor’s Report

Monitor’s Second Report Mapping

Detailed breakdown of the Monitor’s Second Report filed February 20, 2026, with verbatim findings per provision, current compliance status, and the Benchmark module that closes each gap.

Open the mapping →
Proposal

FCSO Proposal, Updated February 2026

Refreshed proposal reflecting the Monitor’s Second Report, the full 34-row provision mapping, and pricing for the platform and training module.

Open the proposal →
EIS Overview

First Sign®: A Modern Approach to Early Intervention

A side-by-side look at why predictive, peer-aware early intervention outperforms traditional threshold-based EWS. Covers the three layers of analysis, the 85% precision benchmark, and the consent decree provisions First Sign® is built to satisfy. Useful context ahead of the EIS Deep Dive.

Open the overview →
Jail EIS Outcomes

Peer Jail Agency Findings

Deidentified results from a peer jail agency operating under federal consent decree, where First Sign® is deployed against the same EIS provisions the Monitor flagged in FCSO’s Second Report. Shows reduction in repeat use-of-force incidents, faster supervisor intervention on flagged deputies, and measurable compliance progress. Happy to walk through the full findings on request.

Open the findings →

Next Steps

Session 1

EIS Deep Dive

Now that we’ve met on this a few times at the executive level, this session is the chance to go a level deeper and walk through exactly how First Sign® works in practice.

WithLt. Colonel Powell, Amelia Joiner (likely), Major Christopher
Focus¶151 EWS, First Sign configuration, data sources
FormatIn-person or Zoom
Date[Confirming]
Session 2

Training Deep Dive

A working session with the training SMEs on why folding training into Benchmark is cleaner and more cost-effective than standing up a separate system like Acadis alongside everything else.

WithMajor Aprille Moore, Major Christopher
FocusTraining documentation, Section III reporting, workflow
FormatIn-person or Zoom
Date[Confirming]
Ben Rosen
Your Point of Contact

Ben Rosen

Director of Partnerships

m 847-867-3029
e [email protected]

What your team has been asking

We’re already running Axon Standards. How does Benchmark fit alongside that?

Benchmark doesn’t replace Axon. The two integrate. Axon handles the immediate incident capture and workflow for use of force and complaints. Benchmark ingests that data alongside training, IA, and personnel records to produce the pattern analysis, EIS behavioral indicators, and wellness monitoring the Monitor specifically called out as gaps. On ¶151, the Monitor’s finding was that the current EWS does not include grievances or external complaints. First Sign® closes that specific gap without disrupting what Axon is already doing.

Most of what we do is jail operations. How does this work for a jail, not patrol?

Benchmark operates in both corrections and patrol environments, configured to whichever is primary for an agency. For FCSO, since the decree is jail focused, the implementation centers on Jail Command workflows: use of force in housing units, grievance intake, supervisor review of deputy interactions with incarcerated people, PREA reporting, restrictive housing reviews, and the quality assurance documentation the Monitor requires. Jail Command sees operational benefit in the day to day workflows. Administrative leadership sees the reporting benefit in what goes to the Monitor. The deep dive with Powell is a good place to walk Jail Command through the corrections-specific configuration in detail.

What happens to our data in Tyler, IAPro, Blue Team, and Axon Standards?

Benchmark is built to sit on top of existing systems, not replace them. Tyler handles CAD, IAPro and Blue Team have been handling IA and use of force (with the Axon Standards transition already underway), and Achieve It handles public-facing reporting. Benchmark integrates with all of the above to pull the relevant data into EIS, pattern analysis, and Monitor reporting. Your teams keep the systems they already work in. Benchmark is the layer on top that ties personnel data, training, IA outcomes, and wellness together so the Monitor sees a single picture rather than fragmented reports. Nothing has to migrate. If FCSO later chooses to consolidate, we can support that, but it is not a requirement to get started.

We’ve been considering hiring a dedicated compliance data analyst. Do we still need one?

Most of what a compliance data analyst would do at FCSO is produce the reports, pattern analyses, and corrective action documentation the Monitor wants. That work is exactly what Benchmark’s platform and embedded analytics team already do, at scale and grounded in a research foundation a single hire cannot replicate. The platform handles data ingestion, tracking, and reporting automatically. Our analytics team handles the quarterly narratives, Monitor responses, and cross-agency benchmarking. FCSO gets broader coverage for less than the fully loaded cost of a new headcount, and the work lives as permanent infrastructure rather than tied to one person who could leave.

What does this cost, and can we use grant funding to help?

Pricing is built around your sworn member count and which modules FCSO adopts. The full proposal with FCSO-specific pricing is in the Resources section above. On funding, Benchmark is an eligible expense under multiple federal programs including COPS Office grants, Bureau of Justice Assistance grants, and the Technology Equity Program. Many agencies use grant funding to offset or fully cover the first contract year. Given the County budget conversations already in progress around consent decree compliance, this is worth exploring early, and we can provide whatever documentation your grant administrator needs.

What other agencies under consent decree are using Benchmark?

Benchmark has been a reference point for multiple agencies operating under federal oversight. Baltimore Police Department won a competitively bid RFP with us in 2023 for a predictive, research-based EIS after consultation with DOJ and the monitoring team (Commissioner Harrison’s full account is at the top of this page). NYC Department of Corrections, also under an active consent decree, participated in a platform demo and is targeting a 2026 pilot per its most recent monitoring report. The consent decree work specifically benefits from Commissioner Harrison’s advisory role at Benchmark, since he led reform at both NOPD and BPD under federal oversight. Happy to arrange a peer agency reference call whenever it’s useful.

What does implementation look like for an agency of our size?

For an agency of FCSO’s size, most customers are live within 4 to 8 weeks. Onboarding covers data migration from your existing systems, configuration to your specific policies and thresholds, and supervisor training. You get a dedicated customer success team with a named point of contact, not a general support queue. Live support is Monday through Friday, 6am to 7pm Central, with a 24-hour escalation path for system-wide issues. We maintain a 99.9% uptime SLA backed by the AWS GovCloud hosting.

What happens to our data if we stop using Benchmark?

Your data is yours, fully and always. You can export everything in PDF, Excel, CSV, or SQL format at any point during the contract, and at offboarding. Benchmark maintains full audit logs through the entire contract term. There’s no lock-in on your records. If your procurement office or the Monitor’s team needs written documentation of data portability rights, we include it in the contract.

Your Data. Fully Protected.

  • CJIS Compliant, external audits passed
  • SOC 2 Type 2 Certified, 3+ consecutive years with no exceptions
  • AWS GovCloud hosting, government-dedicated infrastructure
  • AES-256 encryption at rest, TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit (FIPS 140-2 compliant)
  • TX-RAMP Level 2 · StateRAMP 96% compliance score
  • Annual third-party OWASP penetration test, no critical or high findings
  • CALEA support documentation, aligned to FCSO’s existing accreditation

Every person with access to your agency’s data completes fingerprint-based FBI background checks and CJIS Security Awareness Training.